← All stories

AI security

US Agencies Detail Incident Response Practices for Rogue AI Agents

NIST, CISA and the NSA have shared ten voluntary practices for preparing for, detecting, responding to, recovering from, and reporting incidents involving rogue AI agents, according to SecurityWeek.

Cover for a ai-security story

Three US government agencies — the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) — have jointly set out ten voluntary practices for handling incidents involving rogue AI agents, according to a report from SecurityWeek.

Per SecurityWeek, the practices are organized around the full incident lifecycle: preparing for potential incidents, detecting when an AI agent behaves in unintended or harmful ways, responding to such events, recovering from them, and reporting them afterward. Because the practices are voluntary, they function as a recommended framework rather than a binding requirement for organizations.

The guidance reflects mounting official attention to the security risks posed by agentic AI — systems that can take actions autonomously on behalf of users or organizations. As these systems are deployed more broadly, the possibility that an agent acts outside its intended scope, whether through malfunction, misconfiguration or external manipulation, has become an emerging challenge for security and incident response teams.

SecurityWeek's report indicates the agencies framed the ten practices as practical steps organizations can adopt both to build readiness before an incident occurs and to structure their response and reporting when one does. Organizations that already operate or plan to deploy AI agents may wish to review the guidance and assess how the recommended practices align with their existing incident response plans.

This article is based on reporting by SecurityWeek.

Source: SecurityWeek

How to read this

Authorized-only · evidence-based · point-in-time. Aegis cannot guarantee the absence of weaknesses or hidden devices. On this machine, live external HTTP/TLS may be network-blocked and shown as an honest coverage gap. Severity and confidence are kept separate. Finished assessments persist in the encrypted store while durable storage is bound. A theme choice may persist in this browser. Export remains available for a copy you can take with you.